Voter's Edge California Voter Guide
Conozca la información antes de votar.
Presentado por
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
California State Library@CAStateLibrary
June 7, 2016 — Elecciones Primarias de California

Senado Estatal de CaliforniaCandidato para Distrito 31

Photo de Richard Reed

Richard Reed

51,755 votos (38.8%)Winning
Use tab to activate the candidate button. Use "return" to select this candidate. You can access your list by navigating to 'My Choices'.
Para obtener más información a fondo sobre este candidato, siga los enlaces de cada pestaña en esta sección. En la mayoría de los lectores de pantalla, puede presionar Regresar o Ingresar para entrar a una pestaña y leer el contenido.
El candidato(a) proporcionó información.
Agradezca al candidato por compartir su información en Voter’s Edge.

Mis 3 prioridades principales

  • Llevar agua al sur y al centro de California es mi máxima prioridad.
  • Reducir el tamaño del gobierno y el volumen de la regulación del gobierno es una prioridad.
  • Disminuir los impuestos será también una prioridad.



Profesión:Soy abogado con licencia para ejercer en California; maestro jubilado; antiguo propietario de una empresa teatral.
ninguno, Nunca antes ocupé un cargo público. — Cargo elegido (2016–actualment)
Coordinador, Riverside Arts Foundation (1995–1996)
Director/gerente, Young People's Theatre de Riverside (1986–1996)
Maestro, Distrito Escolar Unificado de Riverside (1975–1986)


California Southern Law School Licenciatura en Derecho (Juris Doctor degree), Leyes (2000)
University of California Riverside Credencial de enseñanza secundaria, Educación (1975)
California Baptist College (hoy California Baptist University) Licenciatura en, Inglés con doble especialidad secundaria en Historia y Teatro (1972)

Actividades comunitarias

Board member, Riverside Dickens Festival (2008–2012)

Preguntas y Respuestas

Preguntas de The League of Women Voters of California Education Fund and California Counts, a public media collaboration. (4)

Climate changes and the continuing drought worry many in California. What new strategies do you believe would ensure that California is able to both satisfy its water needs and protect the environment? Please be specific.
Respuesta de Richard Reed:

Water from Northern California should be pumped to Southern and Central California during rainy seasons to fill reservoirs in the South and not rely on seasonal snow melt.  If necessary, the we tunnel under the Sacramento River to avoid the delta.  Communities that, like Riverside, have their own water sources should be given greater control over their own water policies.

Many Californians are concerned about the influence of money in politics. What can the state legislature do to ensure that decision-making by elected officials is not swayed by moneyed interests at the expense of constituents?
Respuesta de Richard Reed:

Reduce the influence of public employee unions.

There are a variety of proposals to raise California's minimum wage. Many of these proposals face opposition from business groups who are concerned that they would kill jobs. Do you support increasing the minimum wage in California?  In your answer please explain your position on the relationship between wages and jobs with specific reference to the situation in your district. 
Respuesta de Richard Reed:

I oppose increases to the minimum wage.  It is better to have low-paying entry-level jobs that offer upward mobility than to eliminate those jobs by pricing low-skilled workers out of the market and forcing businiesses to downsize and/or automate.

What are your top three fiscal priorities, recognizing the need to balance the state’s income with its spending? 
Respuesta de Richard Reed:

Reduce the size of the state's bureaucracy.  Make the state more business-friendly.  Reduce the size of public pensions.

¿Quién proporcionó dinero a este candidato?


Dinero total recaudado: $12,484

Principales contribuyentes que dieron dinero para apoyar al candidato, por organización:

Employees of REED, RICHARD
Employees of Rich Harris A Law Corporation
Employees of O'Malley Engineering
Lincoln Club of Rverside County
Employees of Ben Clymer's The Body Shop

Más información acerca de contribuciones

Por estado:

California 96.75%
Oregon 3.25%

Por tamaño:

Contribuciones grandes (98.73%)
Contribuciones pequeñas (1.27%)

Por tipo:

De organizaciones (1.42%)
De individuos (98.58%)
Fuente: Análisis de datos de la Secretaría del Estado de California de MapLight.

Creencias poliza

Documentos sobre determinadas posturas

Regulations Kill Economies


Unnecessary regulations are an excessive burden on business and make a free market less free.  There should always be a cost/benefit analysis.  

Position Paper #1

Regulations Kill Economies

Of government it has been said: what you subsidize, you get more of; what you tax you get less of.  The private sector, on the other hand, requires neither taxes nor subsidies.  In a free market economy, you get the results that you allow.  The minimum wage acts as a tax on a business and a subsidy to an otherwise fairly-paid employee.  Fairly paid because the employer and the employee agree on how much the job is worth.

My first job was as a part-time teacher at about $800 per month.  I made that work by renting a nearby studio apartment for $200 per month and walking to work.  I had one pot, one bowl, and one plate and my kitchen was in my bedroom.  In a little over a year, I had saved up enough money to buy a piano which consumed what little space was left.  Twelve years later, I left teaching (at a handsome salary) to run my own theatre company.  Public education lost a good teacher and the business community gained an entrepreneur.  That is the American Dream: going from a job to a better job to owning your own business.  

After ten successful years, I had to close my theatrical touring company because we were being crowded out of the market by other theatrical groups that had access to government subsidies.  We offered a superior product, but we couldn't compete with the government.  Half the time, our group had been paid, not out of the school budget, but by student groups and parent-teacher associations.  But for government interference, I might still have a business that employed the most underemployed worker in this state: the actor.

Just as subsidies interfere with private sector productivity, raising the minimum wage is also detrimental.  If my new entry-level employee is going to cost me $15 per hour, I just won't hire him.  I'll double the workload of my existing employees or I will replace that position with a machine (many restaurants are already using computers to phase out cashiers and waiters).  If I wind up hiring at $15 per hour, my existing employees who make $15 per hour will demand a raise.  If they don't get it, they will quit and apply for my competitor's entry-level position with fewer responsibilities at $15 per hour, unless, of course, the new minimum wage hasn't already driven me and my competitor out of business.  That is how government regulation destroys economic opportunity for both employer and employee.  


When government tries to micromanage the free market through regulation and central planning, the economy suffers and people are deprived of opportunities.  A lower minimum wage and fewer regulations would make California more business-friendly and give businesses a reason not to leave the state as they tend to do.  The free market and the private sector can make California, once again, a land of opportunity, if California will allow it.



Every citizen has sovereignty over his or her own body, but, the state has no authority to take an innocent life, even with the consent of the woman.

Position Paper #2



In 1692, the courts in Salem, Massachusetts began trying citizens for witchcraft, charging them under the flimsiest evidence.  The Salem Witch Trials became a convenient instrument for the elimination of undesirable neighbors.  One such neighbor was Abigail Faulkner who was disliked in the community by those who envied her wealth and position.  She was accused, tried, and convicted of witchcraft and sentenced to hang.  Her sentence was stayed, however, due to the fact that she was pregnant.  The unborn child was an innocent life beyond the government's jurisdiction.  Even the rabidly superstitious judges of Salem knew that they had no authority to take an innocent life. 


Now, taxpayers are asked to fund government-sponsored abortion.  Reproduction is the most private of matters and cannot be interfered with by the state, nor can taxes be used for such a purpose.  Every citizen has sovereignty over his or her own body and a just government must respect that.  However, the state has no authority to take an innocent life, even with the woman's consent.  The law may have to turn a blind eye to the private practices of citizens, but the law does not have to approve.  Taxes should not be used to pay for abortions, nor should the government assist in a practice that it is morally, ethically, historically, and legally forbidden to do.

Información de contacto del candidato

¿Quién más se está postulando?

Comparta este sitio para ayudar a otras personas a investigar sus opciones para las votaciones.